Sophie Glambek til Rask (21 May 1578-15 July 1620)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Claus Glambek til Rask, Værholm og Bjerregård (1537-24 January 1591), governor at Åkjær
Mother:2Berete Folmersdatter Rosenkrantz til Værholm (5 April 1554-after 1625)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:315 September 1609Mogens Pax til Torup (10 July 1577-20 November 1642)Horsens [city/town], Nim Herred [municipality], Loversyssel [county], Jylland [Unknown/Unspecified], Denmark [country]
Children
Attributes
Events
Born:421 May 1578Skanderborg Castle [building], Skanderborg [Unknown/Unspecified], Skanderborg sogn [parish], Hjelmslev Herred [municipality], Åbosyssel [county], Jylland [Unknown/Unspecified], Denmark [country]
Died:515 July 1620
Died:625 July 1620
Buried:729 July 1620Roskilde [city/town], Sømme Herred [municipality], Sjælland [Unknown/Unspecified], Denmark [country]
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 H. R. Hiort-Lorenzen and A. Thiset, Danmarks adels aarbog 1894: (Kjøbenhavn: Vilh. Trydes boghandel, 1894), Glambek (Rutze), p. 137-39.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 , Danmarks adels aarbog 1904: (: , 1904), Mund, p. 335-39.
7 H. R. Hiort-Lorenzen and A. Thiset, Danmarks adels aarbog 1894: (Kjøbenhavn: Vilh. Trydes boghandel, 1894), Glambek (Rutze), p. 137-39.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.