Hr. Erik Eriksen (Løvenbalk) til Aunsbjerg (-after 10 July 1499)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Erik Jensen (Løvenbalk) til Aunsbjerg (-before 1453)
Mother:2Karen Pedersdatter (Gyldenstierne) (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3before 12 March 1458Mette Lauridsdatter (Ulfeld) til Løitved (-)
Married:4before 20 June 1487Thore Eriksdatter (Hvas af Ormstrup) (-after 1515)
Children
Children with Thore Eriksdatter (Hvas af Ormstrup):
Gert Eriksdatter (Løvenbalk) til Aunsbjerg (-after 1517)5
Karen (Løvenbalk) (-after 1518)6
Sophie (Løvenbalk) (-before 1512)7
Pernille (Løvenbalk) (-after 1548)8
Gjertrud Løvenbalk (-after 1548)9
Attributes
Events
Buried:10Viborg Cathedral [building], Viborg [city/town], Nørlyng Herred [municipality], Ommersyssel [county], Jylland [Unknown/Unspecified], Denmark [country]
Died:11after 10 July 1499
Personal Info
He was knighted before 1454.12
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 H. R. Hiort-Lorenzen og A. Thiset, Danmarks Adels Aarbog 1903: (Kjøbenhavn: Vilh. Trydes boghandel, 1903), Løvenbalk, p. 289-93.
2 Ibid
3 H. R. Hiort-Lorenzen and A. Thiset, Danmarks adels aarbog 1900: (Kjøbenhavn: Vilh. Trydes boghandel, 1900), Thott, p. 408-31.
4 H. R. Hiort-Lorenzen og A. Thiset, Danmarks Adels Aarbog 1903: (Kjøbenhavn: Vilh. Trydes boghandel, 1903), Løvenbalk, p. 289-93.
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Ibid
11 Ibid
12 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.