Hr. Niels Timmesen (Rosenkrantz) til Stensballegård (around 1440-1484/85)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Hr. Timme Nielsen (Rosenkrantz) til Engelsholm og Stensballegård (-before 1457), governor (høvedsmand) at Koldinghus
Mother:2Abel Mattisdatter (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:31470Inger Nielsdatter Gyldenstierne til Landting (-1525/26)
Children
Children with Inger Nielsdatter Gyldenstierne til Landting:
Axel Nielsen (Rosenkrantz) til Stensballegård, Landting og Rydhave (17 March 1472-4 February 1551)4
Attributes
Events
Born:5around 1440
Died:61484/85
Between 1 August 1484 and 2 July 1485.
Personal Info
He seems to first have had a clerical career. He became baccalaureus in Rostock 1453 and canon in Ribe. In 1455 he was elected arch deacon (ærkedegn). In 1465 however is he mentioned as knight and member of the national council (rigsråd).7
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Knud J. V. Jespersen, Danmarks Adels Aarbog 1985-1987: (: Dansk adelsforening, 1988), Rosenkrantz no. 28, p. 682.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Knud J. V. Jespersen, Danmarks Adels Aarbog 1985-1987: (: Dansk adelsforening, 1988), Rosenkrantz no. 72, p. 687.
5 Knud J. V. Jespersen, Danmarks Adels Aarbog 1985-1987: (: Dansk adelsforening, 1988), Rosenkrantz no. 28, p. 682.
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.