John Forbes of Pitsligo (around 1487-16 May 1556)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Alexander Forbes of Pitsligo (-around 1496)
Mother:2Isobel (or Elizabeth) Wemyss (-after 16 August 1524)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3Jean Keith (-)
Married:4before 1523Isabel or Elizabeth Innes (-)
Children
Children with :
Alexander Forbes of Pitsligo "the Red Laird" (-1562)5
Arthur Forbes (-1547)6
John Forbes (-)7
William Forbes (-)8
Christian Forbes (-)9
Marjory Forbes (-)10
(Unknown) Forbes (-)11
Attributes
Events
Born:12around 1487
Died:1316 May 1556
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume IV: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1907), Forbes of Pitsligo p. 71, Alexander Forbes.
2 Ibid
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume IV: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1907), Forbes of Pitsligo p. 72, John Forbes.
4 Peter Beauclerk Dewar, Burke's Landed Gentry of Great Britain - The Kingdom in Scotland 19th Edition Volume 1: Together with Members of the Titled and Non-titled Contemporary Establishment (Wilmington, Delaware, USA: Burke's Peerage and Gentry LLC, 2001), Innes-Ker, p. 767-72.
5 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume IV: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1907), Forbes of Pitsligo p. 72, John Forbes.
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Ibid
11 Ibid
12 Ibid
13 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.