Margaret Barclay Allardice (4 July 1816-7 August 1903)


Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property attribute_do::$changedby is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/attribute_do.php on line 48

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property person::$quality is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/person.php on line 281

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Robert Barclay Allardice of Ury and Allardice (25 August 1779-1 May 1854)
Mother:2Mary Dalgarno (-30 August 1820)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:32 April 1840Samuel Ritchie (1813-17 September 1845)
Married:430 July 1854James Tanner (-21 January 1866)
Children
Children with Samuel Ritchie:

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property attribute_do::$changedby is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/attribute_do.php on line 48
Robert Barclay Allardice (19 May 1841-), Mayor of Lostwithiel5
David Stuart Barclay Allardice (21 November 1845-)6
Attributes
Events
Born:74 July 1816
Died:87 August 1903
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Airth, p. 144, Robert Barclay Allardice.
2 Ibid
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Airth, p. 144-45, Margaret Barclay Allardice.
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.